http://altlantic-internationalpartnership.com/2011/05/atlantic-international-partnership-headlines-2-emerging-market-mining-stocks-to-buy/
Traders are usually piling cash into tracker funds, with a lot more purchased in 2010 compared with any year over the last 10 years.
Atlantic International Partnership (AIP) offers a comprehensive service giving you, AIP investors and entrepreneurs access to Marketplaces in your region and around the World.
AIP investors are uniquely dynamic individuals or groups of individuals. AIP investors invest their capital in new or early stage companies. We have found that AIP investors are not a source of capital alone but we have found them to make excellent mentors. As most AIP investors are in fact successful entrepreneurs or business people themselves we have found that they are able to offer entrepreneurs advice and helpful suggestions based on the experience that they have accumulated from their own businesses.
Are you looking in being an international investor?
Traders tend to be attracted by the cheaper tracker funds and the majority believe they provide the less risky alternative, because as their name indicates, they observe stocks in an entire index, instead of attempting to choose winning trades.
Nonetheless, they are often more volatile compared with what investors believe.
Followers feel they may be greater than those manage by account professionals since people won't be able to constantly beat the stock market trading.
Over 2 / 3 of funds frequently don't overcome the index of the stock exchange they may be committed to.
An excellent manager could nevertheless beat a tracker. The most effective in the UK Almost all Firms are very well in advance, using the L&G UK Alpha fund providing dividends of 98.5% over 5 years as the finest tracker, the HSBC FTSE 250, just delivered 28.9%.
Nonetheless within the similar interval the actual toughest tracker still generated 4%, as the worst fund run by a broker, the Rathbone Recovery, shed a stunning 52.6%.
Results via information gurus Morningstar display the common tracker fund profit inside the UK Companies field ended up being 15.2% in the last 5 years. This comes even close to a standard profit of 11.4% regarding funds having a broker.
Spending fewer for your account is among the essential offering factors.
As they do not require associated with professionals, economists or even strategists, the price of operating these will always be reduced.
Frequently they don’t have any advance charges and possess a yearly charge of between 0.25% and 1% annually. Funds having a broker can hold the heading charge of 1% to at least 1.5% per year.
However the correct charges may be substantially increased. The standard Total Costs Percentage, which includes additional expenses for instance attorney's fees, will be 1.68%, but tend to be a little more than 2%.
The notion that the UK tracker is founded on domestic title blue chip firms will be extensive from the mark, nevertheless.
The current FTSE one hundred index provides names numerous will likely have never heard about, such as, Vedanta Resources and Intertek Group.
Over of the FTSE one hundred consists of financial institutions as well as insurance agencies and nearly is made up of gas and oil companies.
Mark Dampier, head of study at financial adviser Hargreaves Lansdown claims this could reveal investors to serious situations.
He explained: 'If underneath is lost from the product industry the FTSE would probably drop in a way. The FTSE 100 will be operated at this time through mining and oils, which mean you, continue to obtain the extremes and you're simply using a trend.'
Here at AIP Madrid we appreciate that each and every individual investor is a uniquely complex person. It’s our belief in this that has led us develop a widely recognised innovative investment philosophy. At AIP we believe that our methodology can significantly increase the success of our private clients investments.
Atlantic International Partnership’s philosophy of investment brings together our thorough assessment of prospective investors with our advanced portfolio building programs. Altogether this allows us to provide tailor made solutions designed to deliver the right performance for each client. These AIP investor profiles allow us to provide the confidence needed between a client and their advisor, helping to make the right decisions in both the good times and the turbulent times. This leads to improved results in performance over the long-term.
Friday, June 24, 2011
Atlantic International Partnership asks Where should I save for retirement?
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20110523004227AA88ugH
Tax-favored retirement accounts such as individual retirement accounts (IRAs) and 401(k)s are the best places to save for your retirement. The different types of plans have different features, but most of them allow you to defer taxes on the money you save and the returns you earn within the account.
Tax-favored retirement accounts such as individual retirement accounts (IRAs) and 401(k)s are the best places to save for your retirement. The different types of plans have different features, but most of them allow you to defer taxes on the money you save and the returns you earn within the account.
What other services does Atlantic International partnership Freight Services provide?
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20110428012043AAtMIn2
Aside from freight services, they also offer Customs Clearance, Marine Cargo Insurance and Supply Chain Management.
Source(s):
What makes Atlantic international partnership Quality Parts different from other tractor parts seller?
http://qna.rediff.com/questions-and-answers/what-makes-atlantic-international-partnership-qual/19685820/answers/19685830
They offer clients the best combination of quality, price and service in every order they place. In addition to that, all their parts are brand new and have one year field time warranty.
Source: http://www.aidtractor.com/
Altlantic International Partnership Headlines: Sticky patch or meltdown?
http://atlanticinternationalpartnership-headlines.com/2011/06/altlantic-international-partnership-headlines-sticky-patch-or-meltdown/
ALBANY, N.Y. (AP) — Tuesday’s big announcement of a long-sought agreement to cap property tax growth in New York was great politics, but soon after the TV lights faded it became clearer the celebration was premature because major elements continue to be negotiated behind closed doors.
Here’s the issue: The Assembly’s powerful leader wants the cap to include a sunset provision, a date when it would have to be reviewed and either extended, changed or allowed to expire. The current bill doesn’t have specific sunset language and tax cap supporters like it that way. They don’t want it threatened by legislative gridlock or inaction every time it comes up for review.
Two days after the press conference that was staged as a victory lap for Gov. Andrew Cuomo and his biggest policy priority, one the proposal’s supporters warned that New Yorkers may be snared in a “bait and switch.”
Cuomo announced a three-way deal to cap property tax growth at 2 percent a year, or inflation, whichever is less. Beside him were Senate Majority Leader Dean Skelos and Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver, along with the minority party leaders and a throng of supportive business groups.
The result was front-page coverage that the deal was done in what one headline called a “home run” in the closing three weeks of the legislative session. For Cuomo and Skelos, the tax cap is a top campaign issue. Silver has agreed to it as long as it’s linked it to one of his top priorities, strengthening rent control for a million New York City renters.
Silver’s bill, released to lawmakers just hours before the press conference, is the basis of the tax cap agreement. The last lines of the 20-page bill say the tax cap would be in effect “only so long as” the New York City rent control laws, which have been extended repeatedly since 1946. The next extension is needed by June 15.
Skelos specifically said in a prepared statement after the murky press conference that the sunset provision isn’t part of the agreement announced Tuesday.
“There’s a long way to go before a final bill is passed,” Skelos said to two reporters in a hallway after the press conference.
E.J. McMahon of the fiscally conservative Manhattan Institute, who Cuomo singled out as a supporter Tuesday, said Thursday that a sunset provision would be a serious change.
“If they change that bill in any respect, especially in regards to a sunset, it isn’t worthy of support,” McMahon. “If they do it, they are guilty of a bait and switch.”
Meanwhile, pressure is mounting.
The powerful New York State United Teachers is making the case that if the cap was in effect this year, two-thirds of budgets would have been rejected. NYSUT President Richard Iannuzzi warns a cap will devastate schools for political expediency and hit poor districts harder. He also said a district that fails to get 60-percent approval of a budget that exceeds the cap will be left with no tax increase, unless they try again, creating what NYSUT calls a “zero cap.”
On Thursday, The New York Times also rejected Silver’s proposal, calling it a recipe for a California-sized disaster for schools and a “political crutch for politicians who don’t have the courage to argue the case for more taxes or for spending cuts.”
Even Cuomo in the days after the press conference struck a less certain stance.
“In Albany, nothing’s done until done, but this would be an historic step,” Cuomo said at a Utica event Wednesday to continue to push for his policy goals. “We’re keeping our fingers crossed.”
On WOR-Radio’s “The John Gambling Show” Thursday Cuomo noted of Albany: “There are no guarantees.”
Cuomo, Skelos and Silver won’t discuss progress in private talks, but continue to promise a tax cap law by the June 20 end of session.
Silver has said the sunset is needed to make sure the cap is working without decimating instruction or local government services. He told the New York Post “the contemplation is it will have a specific date in it.”
Cuomo spokesman Josh Vlasto insisted only “minor items” are unfinished and said “we are not going to negotiate in the press.” He refused to confirm or deny whether a sunset provision is among the “minor items.” He bristled at the thought of any serious snag or opposition, insisting that even McMahon still supports it.
“The Associated Press‘ notion of an ‘erosion’ of support for the tax cap is wishful thinking on their part and the Albany special interests they report on,” Vlasto stated. “The opposite is actually true as the cap is supported by 70 percent of the people of this state, most editorial boards, and the Senate and Assembly leaders and it will be made law at which time we expect a full retraction from The Associated Press.”
Cuomo, who once opposed making the tax cap temporary and decried Albany horse trading of important issues late in the session, also warned of such Albany antics before:
“In this town, people are very good at talking about agreements, making progress towards agreements,” Cuomo chided the Legislature during March budget talks. “They’re very good at tiptoeing along the goal line, but never stepping over … If you don’t have an agreement then basically you have nothing.”
Atlantic International Partnership Headlines: Will ‘The Donald’ get the spotlight back from Obama?
http://www.seattlepi.com/news/article/Analysis-Celebration-of-NY-s-tax-cap-a-bit-early-1400119.phpALBANY, N.Y. (AP) — Tuesday’s big announcement of a long-sought agreement to cap property tax growth in New York was great politics, but soon after the TV lights faded it became clearer the celebration was premature because major elements continue to be negotiated behind closed doors.
Here’s the issue: The Assembly’s powerful leader wants the cap to include a sunset provision, a date when it would have to be reviewed and either extended, changed or allowed to expire. The current bill doesn’t have specific sunset language and tax cap supporters like it that way. They don’t want it threatened by legislative gridlock or inaction every time it comes up for review.
Two days after the press conference that was staged as a victory lap for Gov. Andrew Cuomo and his biggest policy priority, one the proposal’s supporters warned that New Yorkers may be snared in a “bait and switch.”
Cuomo announced a three-way deal to cap property tax growth at 2 percent a year, or inflation, whichever is less. Beside him were Senate Majority Leader Dean Skelos and Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver, along with the minority party leaders and a throng of supportive business groups.
The result was front-page coverage that the deal was done in what one headline called a “home run” in the closing three weeks of the legislative session. For Cuomo and Skelos, the tax cap is a top campaign issue. Silver has agreed to it as long as it’s linked it to one of his top priorities, strengthening rent control for a million New York City renters.
Silver’s bill, released to lawmakers just hours before the press conference, is the basis of the tax cap agreement. The last lines of the 20-page bill say the tax cap would be in effect “only so long as” the New York City rent control laws, which have been extended repeatedly since 1946. The next extension is needed by June 15.
Skelos specifically said in a prepared statement after the murky press conference that the sunset provision isn’t part of the agreement announced Tuesday.
“There’s a long way to go before a final bill is passed,” Skelos said to two reporters in a hallway after the press conference.
E.J. McMahon of the fiscally conservative Manhattan Institute, who Cuomo singled out as a supporter Tuesday, said Thursday that a sunset provision would be a serious change.
“If they change that bill in any respect, especially in regards to a sunset, it isn’t worthy of support,” McMahon. “If they do it, they are guilty of a bait and switch.”
Meanwhile, pressure is mounting.
The powerful New York State United Teachers is making the case that if the cap was in effect this year, two-thirds of budgets would have been rejected. NYSUT President Richard Iannuzzi warns a cap will devastate schools for political expediency and hit poor districts harder. He also said a district that fails to get 60-percent approval of a budget that exceeds the cap will be left with no tax increase, unless they try again, creating what NYSUT calls a “zero cap.”
On Thursday, The New York Times also rejected Silver’s proposal, calling it a recipe for a California-sized disaster for schools and a “political crutch for politicians who don’t have the courage to argue the case for more taxes or for spending cuts.”
Even Cuomo in the days after the press conference struck a less certain stance.
“In Albany, nothing’s done until done, but this would be an historic step,” Cuomo said at a Utica event Wednesday to continue to push for his policy goals. “We’re keeping our fingers crossed.”
On WOR-Radio’s “The John Gambling Show” Thursday Cuomo noted of Albany: “There are no guarantees.”
Cuomo, Skelos and Silver won’t discuss progress in private talks, but continue to promise a tax cap law by the June 20 end of session.
Silver has said the sunset is needed to make sure the cap is working without decimating instruction or local government services. He told the New York Post “the contemplation is it will have a specific date in it.”
Cuomo spokesman Josh Vlasto insisted only “minor items” are unfinished and said “we are not going to negotiate in the press.” He refused to confirm or deny whether a sunset provision is among the “minor items.” He bristled at the thought of any serious snag or opposition, insisting that even McMahon still supports it.
“The Associated Press‘ notion of an ‘erosion’ of support for the tax cap is wishful thinking on their part and the Albany special interests they report on,” Vlasto stated. “The opposite is actually true as the cap is supported by 70 percent of the people of this state, most editorial boards, and the Senate and Assembly leaders and it will be made law at which time we expect a full retraction from The Associated Press.”
Cuomo, who once opposed making the tax cap temporary and decried Albany horse trading of important issues late in the session, also warned of such Albany antics before:
“In this town, people are very good at talking about agreements, making progress towards agreements,” Cuomo chided the Legislature during March budget talks. “They’re very good at tiptoeing along the goal line, but never stepping over … If you don’t have an agreement then basically you have nothing.”
Atlantic International Partnership Headlines: Will ‘The Donald’ get the spotlight back from Obama?
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Atlantic-International-Partnership-Article-Reviews/210854385602305
Donald Trump, who doesn’t hesitate to make painfully blunt remarks, sort of got overlooked during the past week, and will have to work diligently to recover his popularity.
Trump’s speedy ascent to the top in Republican polls with a signature pompous capture of media attention that surprised the political world, is now at risk. Many have sneered at the idea that he is serious about his presidential expectations. Now, he will have to pick himself up, brush himself off and get back into the fight.
The killing of Osama bin Laden, and the success of Barack Obama’s administration have drawn attention away from other candidates, as well as Trump. Since Trump was so loudly vocal on the subject of “the birth certificate,” the impact of Obama’s success was even more devastating to him. During the time when Obama’s birth certificate was receiving so much attention and he made the statement stating he had “other things to do,” the world wasn’t aware Obama was referring to the planning of a daring raid by helicopter, to destroy a “most-wanted” terrorist and murderer.
It is no surprise that Obama leads Trump by a hefty percentage in a “Newsweek/Daily Beast poll” taken after the mission to get bin Laden. Trump’s popularity dropped considerably as 64% of the people polled expressed negative feelings about him.
At the “White House Correspondents” Dinner, Trump was roasted to an embarrassingly great extent, and SNL also referred to Trump as a joke. These events inferred that he was not serious in his pursuit of the presidential position. Trump has avoided speaking publicly since the death of bin Laden, except for congratulating President Obama and he gave no response to a request for an interview, as well as canceling TV appearances.
Who knows how The Donald will overcome this hurdle and how or if, he will respond to the claims revealed by NY1 cable station, saying he never voted in primary elections for a period of 21 years; the information that he disclosed about a high draft lottery number keeping him from fighting in Vietnam, which was found to be debatable, if not untrue; the “Smoking Gun Website,” which stated a series of student deferments were received by Trump in college and then, after graduation, that he got a medical deferment?
Trump has a reputation for getting headlines. All of these actions and reactions are proverbial fodder for the media. This is not an indication, however, that Trump can steal the show again and seriously get himself back into the race for President, but the fact is, he certainly knows how to garner attention and news.
President Obama has now put himself in an enviable position – one that will be difficult to overcome.
Trump’s speedy ascent to the top in Republican polls with a signature pompous capture of media attention that surprised the political world, is now at risk. Many have sneered at the idea that he is serious about his presidential expectations. Now, he will have to pick himself up, brush himself off and get back into the fight.
The killing of Osama bin Laden, and the success of Barack Obama’s administration have drawn attention away from other candidates, as well as Trump. Since Trump was so loudly vocal on the subject of “the birth certificate,” the impact of Obama’s success was even more devastating to him. During the time when Obama’s birth certificate was receiving so much attention and he made the statement stating he had “other things to do,” the world wasn’t aware Obama was referring to the planning of a daring raid by helicopter, to destroy a “most-wanted” terrorist and murderer.
It is no surprise that Obama leads Trump by a hefty percentage in a “Newsweek/Daily Beast poll” taken after the mission to get bin Laden. Trump’s popularity dropped considerably as 64% of the people polled expressed negative feelings about him.
At the “White House Correspondents” Dinner, Trump was roasted to an embarrassingly great extent, and SNL also referred to Trump as a joke. These events inferred that he was not serious in his pursuit of the presidential position. Trump has avoided speaking publicly since the death of bin Laden, except for congratulating President Obama and he gave no response to a request for an interview, as well as canceling TV appearances.
Who knows how The Donald will overcome this hurdle and how or if, he will respond to the claims revealed by NY1 cable station, saying he never voted in primary elections for a period of 21 years; the information that he disclosed about a high draft lottery number keeping him from fighting in Vietnam, which was found to be debatable, if not untrue; the “Smoking Gun Website,” which stated a series of student deferments were received by Trump in college and then, after graduation, that he got a medical deferment?
Trump has a reputation for getting headlines. All of these actions and reactions are proverbial fodder for the media. This is not an indication, however, that Trump can steal the show again and seriously get himself back into the race for President, but the fact is, he certainly knows how to garner attention and news.
President Obama has now put himself in an enviable position – one that will be difficult to overcome.
Atlantic International Partnership Headlines:Analysis: Celebration of NY’s tax cap a bit early
http://atlanticinternationalpartnershipreviews.com/2011/06/atlantic-international-partnership-headlinesanalysis-celebration-of-nys-tax-cap-a-bit-early/
ALBANY, N.Y. (AP) — Tuesday’s big announcement of a long-sought agreement to cap property tax growth in New York was great politics, but soon after the TV lights faded it became clearer the celebration was premature because major elements continue to be negotiated behind closed doors.
Here’s the issue: The Assembly’s powerful leader wants the cap to include a sunset provision, a date when it would have to be reviewed and either extended, changed or allowed to expire. The current bill doesn’t have specific sunset language and tax cap supporters like it that way. They don’t want it threatened by legislative gridlock or inaction every time it comes up for review.
Two days after the press conference that was staged as a victory lap for Gov. Andrew Cuomo and his biggest policy priority, one the proposal’s supporters warned that New Yorkers may be snared in a “bait and switch.”
Cuomo announced a three-way deal to cap property tax growth at 2 percent a year, or inflation, whichever is less. Beside him were Senate Majority Leader Dean Skelos and Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver, along with the minority party leaders and a throng of supportive business groups.
The result was front-page coverage that the deal was done in what one headline called a “home run” in the closing three weeks of the legislative session. For Cuomo and Skelos, the tax cap is a top campaign issue. Silver has agreed to it as long as it’s linked it to one of his top priorities, strengthening rent control for a million New York City renters.
Silver’s bill, released to lawmakers just hours before the press conference, is the basis of the tax cap agreement. The last lines of the 20-page bill say the tax cap would be in effect “only so long as” the New York City rent control laws, which have been extended repeatedly since 1946. The next extension is needed by June 15.
Skelos specifically said in a prepared statement after the murky press conference that the sunset provision isn’t part of the agreement announced Tuesday.
“There’s a long way to go before a final bill is passed,” Skelos said to two reporters in a hallway after the press conference.
E.J. McMahon of the fiscally conservative Manhattan Institute, who Cuomo singled out as a supporter Tuesday, said Thursday that a sunset provision would be a serious change.
“If they change that bill in any respect, especially in regards to a sunset, it isn’t worthy of support,” McMahon. “If they do it, they are guilty of a bait and switch.”
Meanwhile, pressure is mounting.
The powerful New York State United Teachers is making the case that if the cap was in effect this year, two-thirds of budgets would have been rejected. NYSUT President Richard Iannuzzi warns a cap will devastate schools for political expediency and hit poor districts harder. He also said a district that fails to get 60-percent approval of a budget that exceeds the cap will be left with no tax increase, unless they try again, creating what NYSUT calls a “zero cap.”
On Thursday, The New York Times also rejected Silver’s proposal, calling it a recipe for a California-sized disaster for schools and a “political crutch for politicians who don’t have the courage to argue the case for more taxes or for spending cuts.”
Even Cuomo in the days after the press conference struck a less certain stance.
“In Albany, nothing’s done until done, but this would be an historic step,” Cuomo said at a Utica event Wednesday to continue to push for his policy goals. “We’re keeping our fingers crossed.”
On WOR-Radio’s “The John Gambling Show” Thursday Cuomo noted of Albany: “There are no guarantees.”
Cuomo, Skelos and Silver won’t discuss progress in private talks, but continue to promise a tax cap law by the June 20 end of session.
Silver has said the sunset is needed to make sure the cap is working without decimating instruction or local government services. He told the New York Post “the contemplation is it will have a specific date in it.”
Cuomo spokesman Josh Vlasto insisted only “minor items” are unfinished and said “we are not going to negotiate in the press.” He refused to confirm or deny whether a sunset provision is among the “minor items.” He bristled at the thought of any serious snag or opposition, insisting that even McMahon still supports it.
“The Associated Press‘ notion of an ‘erosion’ of support for the tax cap is wishful thinking on their part and the Albany special interests they report on,” Vlasto stated. “The opposite is actually true as the cap is supported by 70 percent of the people of this state, most editorial boards, and the Senate and Assembly leaders and it will be made law at which time we expect a full retraction from The Associated Press.”
Cuomo, who once opposed making the tax cap temporary and decried Albany horse trading of important issues late in the session, also warned of such Albany antics before:
“In this town, people are very good at talking about agreements, making progress towards agreements,” Cuomo chided the Legislature during March budget talks. “They’re very good at tiptoeing along the goal line, but never stepping over … If you don’t have an agreement then basically you have nothing.”
Read more: http://www.seattlepi.com/news/article/Analysis-Celebration-of-NY-
ALBANY, N.Y. (AP) — Tuesday’s big announcement of a long-sought agreement to cap property tax growth in New York was great politics, but soon after the TV lights faded it became clearer the celebration was premature because major elements continue to be negotiated behind closed doors.
Here’s the issue: The Assembly’s powerful leader wants the cap to include a sunset provision, a date when it would have to be reviewed and either extended, changed or allowed to expire. The current bill doesn’t have specific sunset language and tax cap supporters like it that way. They don’t want it threatened by legislative gridlock or inaction every time it comes up for review.
Two days after the press conference that was staged as a victory lap for Gov. Andrew Cuomo and his biggest policy priority, one the proposal’s supporters warned that New Yorkers may be snared in a “bait and switch.”
Cuomo announced a three-way deal to cap property tax growth at 2 percent a year, or inflation, whichever is less. Beside him were Senate Majority Leader Dean Skelos and Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver, along with the minority party leaders and a throng of supportive business groups.
The result was front-page coverage that the deal was done in what one headline called a “home run” in the closing three weeks of the legislative session. For Cuomo and Skelos, the tax cap is a top campaign issue. Silver has agreed to it as long as it’s linked it to one of his top priorities, strengthening rent control for a million New York City renters.
Silver’s bill, released to lawmakers just hours before the press conference, is the basis of the tax cap agreement. The last lines of the 20-page bill say the tax cap would be in effect “only so long as” the New York City rent control laws, which have been extended repeatedly since 1946. The next extension is needed by June 15.
Skelos specifically said in a prepared statement after the murky press conference that the sunset provision isn’t part of the agreement announced Tuesday.
“There’s a long way to go before a final bill is passed,” Skelos said to two reporters in a hallway after the press conference.
E.J. McMahon of the fiscally conservative Manhattan Institute, who Cuomo singled out as a supporter Tuesday, said Thursday that a sunset provision would be a serious change.
“If they change that bill in any respect, especially in regards to a sunset, it isn’t worthy of support,” McMahon. “If they do it, they are guilty of a bait and switch.”
Meanwhile, pressure is mounting.
The powerful New York State United Teachers is making the case that if the cap was in effect this year, two-thirds of budgets would have been rejected. NYSUT President Richard Iannuzzi warns a cap will devastate schools for political expediency and hit poor districts harder. He also said a district that fails to get 60-percent approval of a budget that exceeds the cap will be left with no tax increase, unless they try again, creating what NYSUT calls a “zero cap.”
On Thursday, The New York Times also rejected Silver’s proposal, calling it a recipe for a California-sized disaster for schools and a “political crutch for politicians who don’t have the courage to argue the case for more taxes or for spending cuts.”
Even Cuomo in the days after the press conference struck a less certain stance.
“In Albany, nothing’s done until done, but this would be an historic step,” Cuomo said at a Utica event Wednesday to continue to push for his policy goals. “We’re keeping our fingers crossed.”
On WOR-Radio’s “The John Gambling Show” Thursday Cuomo noted of Albany: “There are no guarantees.”
Cuomo, Skelos and Silver won’t discuss progress in private talks, but continue to promise a tax cap law by the June 20 end of session.
Silver has said the sunset is needed to make sure the cap is working without decimating instruction or local government services. He told the New York Post “the contemplation is it will have a specific date in it.”
Cuomo spokesman Josh Vlasto insisted only “minor items” are unfinished and said “we are not going to negotiate in the press.” He refused to confirm or deny whether a sunset provision is among the “minor items.” He bristled at the thought of any serious snag or opposition, insisting that even McMahon still supports it.
“The Associated Press‘ notion of an ‘erosion’ of support for the tax cap is wishful thinking on their part and the Albany special interests they report on,” Vlasto stated. “The opposite is actually true as the cap is supported by 70 percent of the people of this state, most editorial boards, and the Senate and Assembly leaders and it will be made law at which time we expect a full retraction from The Associated Press.”
Cuomo, who once opposed making the tax cap temporary and decried Albany horse trading of important issues late in the session, also warned of such Albany antics before:
“In this town, people are very good at talking about agreements, making progress towards agreements,” Cuomo chided the Legislature during March budget talks. “They’re very good at tiptoeing along the goal line, but never stepping over … If you don’t have an agreement then basically you have nothing.”
Read more: http://www.seattlepi.com/news/article/Analysis-Celebration-of-NY-
Altlantic International Partnership Headlines: The Day the Internet Shut Down. LOL.
http://atlanticinternationalpartnershipnews.com/2011/06/altlantic-international-partnership-headlines-the-day-the-internet-shut-down-lol/
On June 14, the day designated as Titanic Takeover Tuesday, a group of hackers known as LulzSec took down the website of the CIA, hacked into 62,000 email accounts and organized a telephone call-in request line for hackers to flood the phone lines of the FBI. And that’s just days after they hacked into the U.S. Senate website, took down the Sony PlayStation Network, defaced the PBS website and generally wreaked havoc on sites across the Internet. Unlike the hacktivist splinter group Anonymous, LulzSec makes no pretense of doing anything more than generally pranking the Internet – if you consider hacking into the official websites of the U.S. government a “prank.”
Lulz, of course, is the plural form of LOL, and typically gets translated as “just for kicks.” As in, “Hey, we just took down the CIA website. We did it for the lulz.” Or, “I just threw a pie in your face and slashed your car’s tires. Epic lulz.” While Anonymous takes on political and moral issues – like the arrest of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange or the situation in Iran – with hacktivist-style interventions, LulzSec is more content to pull Ashton Kutcher-style Internet pranks and laugh about it with 180,000 of their closest Twitter followers. Decide for yourself: the unofficial symbol of Anonymous is the V for Vendetta mask, while the unofficial symbol of LulzSec looks like that cartoon Proust guy from Vanity Fair. (Or maybe it’s the Pringles guy? LOL.)
So what does it mean for the future of the Internet that LulzSec has been systematically pranking some of the world’s largest corporations and governments? Is it a “bad new world” for the Internet (as Sony CEO Howard Stringer put it) — a fateful sign that the Internet Kill Switch might be a lot easier to access than any of us ever thought? Or just some harmless pranks by a bunch of script kiddies with really powerful computers, looking for a few laughs and some attention from the world?
If you check out the LulzSec website, they announce their mission statement: to bring high-quality fun back to the Internet (at your expense, of course. LOL). Turn up the volume: there’s the theme from The Love Boat playing, and a painfully rudimentary-looking website. Seriously, governments are supposed to be afraid of these people? Are you laughing? Maybe, umm, that is, as long as your credit card data hasn’t been swiped, your email account info wasn’t made public, or your Sony PlayStation videogame wasn’t taken offline for days at a time.
Certainly, the U.S. government isn’t smiling, especially since any U.S. Senate hack could result in sensitive information being distributed to the Web. It’s also more than a bit embarrassing that our national intelligence folks – the guys who gave the greenlight to that whole DARPA Internet thing, are looking like The Internet Gang That Couldn’t Shoot Straight. Government officials claim that hackers such as LulzSec are in violation of Computer Fraud acts, and could land up to 20 years in federal prison. In Spain, the authorities rounded up and arrested a bunch of Anonymous hackers, tipped off by the V for Vendetta masks they left behind on their computers.
One thing is clear – the U.S. applauds when hacktivists and democratic activists take down the websites of anti-democratic governments in the Middle East. The applause is much less appreciative when that style of Internet activism extends into places like, well, Sweden. We fight against ham-fisted attempts to control the mythical Internet Kill Switch in Syria and Iran and China, but are eager to shut things down the moment that the hackers get a bit rambunctious at home. The Day the Internet Shut Down (aka #TitanicTakeoverTuesday) will be remembered as the day we lost our collective innocence on the Internet: The cute overload LOL Cats sank on the Internet Titanic.
On June 14, the day designated as Titanic Takeover Tuesday, a group of hackers known as LulzSec took down the website of the CIA, hacked into 62,000 email accounts and organized a telephone call-in request line for hackers to flood the phone lines of the FBI. And that’s just days after they hacked into the U.S. Senate website, took down the Sony PlayStation Network, defaced the PBS website and generally wreaked havoc on sites across the Internet. Unlike the hacktivist splinter group Anonymous, LulzSec makes no pretense of doing anything more than generally pranking the Internet – if you consider hacking into the official websites of the U.S. government a “prank.”
Lulz, of course, is the plural form of LOL, and typically gets translated as “just for kicks.” As in, “Hey, we just took down the CIA website. We did it for the lulz.” Or, “I just threw a pie in your face and slashed your car’s tires. Epic lulz.” While Anonymous takes on political and moral issues – like the arrest of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange or the situation in Iran – with hacktivist-style interventions, LulzSec is more content to pull Ashton Kutcher-style Internet pranks and laugh about it with 180,000 of their closest Twitter followers. Decide for yourself: the unofficial symbol of Anonymous is the V for Vendetta mask, while the unofficial symbol of LulzSec looks like that cartoon Proust guy from Vanity Fair. (Or maybe it’s the Pringles guy? LOL.)
So what does it mean for the future of the Internet that LulzSec has been systematically pranking some of the world’s largest corporations and governments? Is it a “bad new world” for the Internet (as Sony CEO Howard Stringer put it) — a fateful sign that the Internet Kill Switch might be a lot easier to access than any of us ever thought? Or just some harmless pranks by a bunch of script kiddies with really powerful computers, looking for a few laughs and some attention from the world?
If you check out the LulzSec website, they announce their mission statement: to bring high-quality fun back to the Internet (at your expense, of course. LOL). Turn up the volume: there’s the theme from The Love Boat playing, and a painfully rudimentary-looking website. Seriously, governments are supposed to be afraid of these people? Are you laughing? Maybe, umm, that is, as long as your credit card data hasn’t been swiped, your email account info wasn’t made public, or your Sony PlayStation videogame wasn’t taken offline for days at a time.
Certainly, the U.S. government isn’t smiling, especially since any U.S. Senate hack could result in sensitive information being distributed to the Web. It’s also more than a bit embarrassing that our national intelligence folks – the guys who gave the greenlight to that whole DARPA Internet thing, are looking like The Internet Gang That Couldn’t Shoot Straight. Government officials claim that hackers such as LulzSec are in violation of Computer Fraud acts, and could land up to 20 years in federal prison. In Spain, the authorities rounded up and arrested a bunch of Anonymous hackers, tipped off by the V for Vendetta masks they left behind on their computers.
One thing is clear – the U.S. applauds when hacktivists and democratic activists take down the websites of anti-democratic governments in the Middle East. The applause is much less appreciative when that style of Internet activism extends into places like, well, Sweden. We fight against ham-fisted attempts to control the mythical Internet Kill Switch in Syria and Iran and China, but are eager to shut things down the moment that the hackers get a bit rambunctious at home. The Day the Internet Shut Down (aka #TitanicTakeoverTuesday) will be remembered as the day we lost our collective innocence on the Internet: The cute overload LOL Cats sank on the Internet Titanic.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)